boucle: (pic#17884017)
connie fontaine ([personal profile] boucle) wrote in [community profile] teaic2025-06-16 03:10 pm

(no subject)

Hello, intrepid Interns. This is just a friendly reminder that your debate on the ethics and dilemmas of time travel is this Wednesday, so you'll want to pay extra attention to your classes on maintaining the timeline, temporal law, and paradox risks in the coming days.

Before I came to work with TEA, I spent over a decade as a Time Bandit, which gives me a unique perspective on these topics. Feel free to ask me anything on this post in the name of research and I'll do my best to answer honestly.


Vero
Do you want to play Devil's Advocate or should I? I'm happy to do it but it does feel a little on the nose.

SΓ©bastien & Theun
Do either of you know why Teddy doesn't like Gus?
craquelure: (πŸ”± 75 -= grimace)

CST

[personal profile] craquelure 2025-06-17 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
You're not interested in him now, are you.
craquelure: (πŸ”± 09 +=)

CST

[personal profile] craquelure 2025-06-17 12:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Now that we've established you won't be marrying him, I suppose I can support this [...] endeavor.
theun: (AC104 21537 copy)

CST

[personal profile] theun 2025-06-17 01:09 am (UTC)(link)
I can't give him a good review as long-term partner material.
craquelure: (πŸ”± 35 =)

CST

[personal profile] craquelure 2025-06-17 02:55 am (UTC)(link)
He married Tess. Do they share the "friends-to-marriage" habit? It's something we should keep in mind. I wouldn't be able to deliver a genuine speech at your reception.
craquelure: (Default)

CST

[personal profile] craquelure 2025-06-17 03:04 am (UTC)(link)
"Pattern" would have been a better word.
craquelure: (πŸ”± 74 +?=?)

CST

[personal profile] craquelure 2025-06-17 03:15 am (UTC)(link)
Yes and for most of human history there have been people who didn't want to attend the wedding.
craquelure: (πŸ”± 34 =)

CST

[personal profile] craquelure 2025-06-17 03:29 am (UTC)(link)
Understood. But you believe he needs a friend. Are you willing to fulfil the role?
craquelure: (πŸ”± 59 -=)

CST

[personal profile] craquelure 2025-06-17 03:32 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, you've collected us. I've even recently been told that people with unpleasant personalities need companionship. You appear to have received the memo.
craquelure: (πŸ”± 99 = facts)

CST

[personal profile] craquelure 2025-06-17 03:40 am (UTC)(link)
I was dogpiled upon by a gang of do-gooders.
craquelure: (πŸ”± 05 =?)

CST

[personal profile] craquelure 2025-06-17 04:28 am (UTC)(link)
No. And to answer your original question, I've already put out hits on Mallory, Teddy, and Benjamin.
Edited (yes he did) 2025-06-17 04:28 (UTC)
craquelure: (πŸ”± 92 =?!)

CST

[personal profile] craquelure 2025-06-17 12:55 pm (UTC)(link)
We'll move Victoria in.